Dropbox opens to public

The slick, file-syncing service I mentioned a few weeks ago has emerged from beta.  I highly recommend it.

Comcast to institute 250-gig cap

I don’t know yet whether I should be outraged about this new policy, mainly because I don’t know how much bandwidth I actually use -- Comcast won’t tell me. By policy, the company won’t tell you how much you’ve used until you've already exceeded the cap. If you exceed the cap again within a year, Comcast cuts off service.

I got the warning last year after I went on vacation and a buggy program (TVTonic, the company that helped NBC bring Olympic downloads to Windows Vista Media Center) kept downloading video over and over again. Before I figured out what was going on, I pleaded with Comcast to tell me how much I had used and when the peak download times occurred, thinking someone was leeching my network. The Comcast rep couldn’t have been less cooperative.

I figured out the problem on my own and have been in Comcast’s good graces ever since. But to this day, I don’t know how close I’m coming to that usage cap. While 250-gigabytes sounds like a lot, I use my Internet for downloading movies and TV shows on Xbox Live, playing video games online, my Vonage phone line, Skype video calls, streaming Brazilian radio stations, uploading and of course, regular Web browsing and e-mail.

Maybe that adds up to a lot of data; maybe it’s well short of 250 gigabytes. The bottom line is, I’ll never know, thanks to Comcast’s poor customer service.

I understand that Comcast needs to make a return on its investment. But by keeping users in the dark until they’ve exceeded the cap, the company is going to chill a lot of legitimate uses of the Internet. And that is going to make its service a lot less valuable.

Photosynth goes public

I’ve written about this cool photo mapping/modeling technology before, but now Photosynth lets anyone create their very own photo set.

Live Mesh, SugarSync invites

I just filed a story on file-syncing/online-backup services and have a few beta invitations to Live Mesh and Dropbox for anyone who wants one.

Both of these services work pretty well, though Dropbox sometimes fails to update files quickly to connected computers. And Live Mesh isn’t yet available on Macs. But that’s why they’re called betas, right?

Leave a comment with your e-mail address if you’re interested.

Update: It looks as though Live Mesh is now open to everyone, so no invite needed.

Firefox 3 is pretty darn good

Firefox has long been my primary Web browser,but I was waiting until my add-ons -- especially Google Toolbar -- were compatible before installing the newest version on all all of my machines.

So I’ve finally installed it and must say, version 3 is a dramatic improvement.

Livescribe Pulse Smartpen

I mentioned this electronic pen in a story I did a while ago about note-taking tools, but it looks like it's finally out for sale.

It's a pen that records your handwriting at the same time as it records audio. So in addition to your written notes, you have an actual recording to refer to later. After you're done with, say, an interview or class, you can point to a particular place on the paper, and the pen plays back what you were recording at the time -- sort of like OneNote for paper.

The pen also makes it easy to transfer note to your PC and upload them to the Internet to share, audio and all. I wish OneNote were as easy to share.

This could be a seriously cool tool for journalists -- I'd get one myself if the price were a little lower. If anything ever happed to my 2710p, I'd seriously consider buying a cheap laptop replacement and one of these Smartpens.

The Pulse does need special paper, and it doesn't look like they sell a reporter's notepad. They do sell a Moleskin-type journal pad that cost $25. Ouch. The company says you'll soon be able to print out your own special paper on any laser printer.

Reviews: Gizmodo, New York Times.

Google Fixes Gmail IMAP Problem on Windows Mobile

Yay! It's actually useful again!

Gmail IMAP is next to useless on Windows Mobile

I was aware that Google's e-mail service had a problem in which HTML mail accessed through IMAP on Windows Mobile devices shows up as blanks, but it never bothered me as much as it did today.

I got an urgent e-mail from work asking me to check a typo in a graphic I had sent last night sent -- it came in the form of a PDF (this actually makes a lot of sense when it comes to formatted graphics). Not only could I not read the message using Windows Mobile's default e-mail, I couldn't download the attachment, either.

Forwarding the message to my Yahoo account from the phone's e-mail software didn't work, because the message had been ruined by that point. So I had to log in to Gmail's Web interface and forward it to Yahoo from there. What a pain.

Maybe this is a Windows Mobile problem. But it doesn't matter -- a lot of people use the OS, and Yahoo has figured it out. Google engineers are aware of the problem, but apparently, don't consider it much of a priority.

A practical use for Photosynth

I've written separately about Microsoft Labs' Photosynth and Live Search Maps before, and now I can write about them at the same time. Microsoft apparently has incorporated the former into the later.

Using Photosynth's photo-transition technology, maps users can now scroll smoothly between separate high-resolution birds-eye photos. In addition to being very cool, the effect makes the birds-eye feature of Live Search Maps much easier to use.

Microsoft also improved the layout and user interface and upgraded its driving directions -- it will incorporate traffic into your route, for instance. And this might be just my impression, but the whole thing seems to have gotten a bit snappier.

I meant to write about this earlier, but I got to put Google Maps and Live Search Maps in a head-to-head competition a few weeks ago, on the morning of a traffic-clogging accident on the Dumbarton Bridge. Google showed the traffic flowing freely on the bridge; Microsoft correctly showed the bright red "standstill" line, along with a pop-up description of the accident.

So far it hasn't been enough to get me to switch away from Google Maps, but it's a step in that direction.

Google mobile

I noticed today that links to New York Times stories from Google's personalized mobile homepage go straight to the Times' mobile Web site rather than Google's "mobilized" version (where Google intercepts and reformats the regular site for mobile phone users).

I like this. As handy as Google's reformatting is for many sites, I'd rather see the true mobile version for sites that have one.

I know (semi)-famous people!

Andrea's first multimedia project appeared online today (she did all the 3-D stuff and helped with some of the other things).

And a friend's Web site, CostHelper.com, got mentioned in the Wall Street Journal.

Kudos all around.

Live Search for Mobile

Microsoft has updated Live Search Mobile, a search and mapping application for Windows Mobile- and Java-equipped phones. The new version offers movie showtimes, better GPS support and the ability to cache previously viewed maps for faster performance.

It's a lot like Google Maps Mobile, though if forced to choose, I'd have to give a slight edge to Microsoft on this one. Though I prefer Google Maps on my PC -- it's the snappiest online mapping service by far -- I've always liked the way Microsoft/MSN/Live maps look. It's the closest thing I've seen to "real" paper maps. Now, I can get the maps I like in a service that's just as fast as Google's alternative.

Anyway, both are handy little applications to have on your phone.

Separately, Microsoft also updated its Live Search Web service for mobile phones. Among other things, the new version lists search results across multiple categories, much like Google's standard PC Web search. It's pretty handy -- I'm not sure why Google doesn't do the same thing its mobile searches.

Still, Google's mobile search gave me much better results in two quick tests.

On Google, a phone search for "7-11" listed nearby stores -- Microsoft gave me what looked like completely random results.

A Google search on "Harry Potter," meanwhile, gave me local showtimes for the movie, a couple of recent news stories, J.K. Rowling's official site, the official Harry Potter site, the Wikipedia entry and more. Microsoft gave me the Wikipedia entry, some photos (a nice touch, actually). It had a space for news stories and local results (showtimes, etc.) but they were empty -- despite knowing my home address. So Google was far more useful in both situations.

It seems Microsoft has a little more work to do.